英语原文共 35 页，剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料
Strategic leadership research:moving on
战略领导力研究：不断展望
Kimberly B.Boal,Robert Hooijberg
During the last 20 years, the field of strategic leadership has undergone both a rejuvenation and a metamorphosis. We argue that the essence of strategic leadership involves the capacity to learn, the capacity to change, and managerial wisdom. Against this backdrop, we first review issues related to under what conditions, when, and how strategic leadership matters. Next, we selectively review three streams of theory and research. The first is strategic leadership theory and its antecedent, Upper Echelon theory. The second stream of theory and research focuses on what Bryman has labeled the “new” leadership theories. These include charismatic, transformational, and visionary theories of leadership. The last stream of research we classify as the “emergent” theories of leadership. Among these are theories that explore behavioral and cognitive complexity as well as social intelligence. Finally, we attempt to suggest how the “new” and “emergent” theories can be integrated within what we claim is the essence of strategic leadership.
在过去的20年里，战略领导力研究领域经历了复兴与变化。我们认为战略领导力的本质包括吸收能力、适应能力和管理智慧。在这样的背景下，我们首先回顾与什么条件、何时以及战略领导力是怎么起作用的相关问题。其次，我们选择性地回顾三个理论和研究流派。第一个流派是战略领导力理论和它的前身，高阶理论。第二个理论和研究流派集中于bryman提出的“新的”领导理论。这些理论包括魅力型领导、变革式领导和愿景式领导。最后一个研究流派我们归类为“紧急”领导理论。其中包括探索式行为和认知复杂性以及社会智能的理论。最后，我们试图给出建议如何将“新的”和“紧急”的理论融入我们所说的战略领导力的本质中。
Since 1980, the study of leadership has undergone both rejuvenation and metamor-phosis. Rejuvenation in that the study of leadership seemed like an old friend in which the field of management had lost interest. At the end of the 1970s and beginning of the 1980s, leadership as a field of study had reached an impasse: little new theory was being developed, and serious scholars were asking not where the field should go next but whether leadership even matters. Notable exceptions included the early work by House (1977) on charismatic leadership and Lord (1977) on implicit theories of leadership. By the mid 1980s, however, a metamorphosis away from the study of “supervisory” leadership (House amp; Aditya, 1997) toward the study of strategic leadership had begun. With this change in emphasis came a newfound sense of excitement initially centering on Upper Echelon theory (Ham-brick amp; Mason, 1984) and the study of Top Management Teams (TMTs) and what Bryman (1992) has labeled the “new” leadership theories (Hunt, 1999).
自1980年以来，领导力的研究经历了复兴和变化。领导力的复兴研究在管理学领域已经变成了一个老生常谈的话题，研究者对此早已失去兴趣。在20世纪70年代末和80年代初，领导力作为一个研究领域已经陷入了一个僵局：几乎没有新的理论在发展，且更严重的是，学者们不问这个领域该往何处发展，只研究领导力是否重要。值得注意的例外包括House（1977）关于魅力型领导的早期工作和Lord（1977）关于领导的隐含理论。然而，到80年代中期，从“监督型”领导（House ＆ Aditya 1997）的研究到战略领导力研究的变革已经开始。随着这种重点的改变，出现了一种新的兴奋感，最初集中于上层梯队理论（Hambrick ＆Mason，1984）和顶级管理团队（TMT）的研究，以及被Bryman（1992）称为“新的”领导力理论（Hunt，1999）。
Included in these new leadership theories are charismatic theories of leadership (e.g., Conger amp; Kanungo, 1987; House, 1977; Shamir, House, amp; Arthur, 1993), transformational theories of leadership (e.g., Bass, 1985); and visionary theories of leadership (e.g., Bennis amp; Nanus, 1985; Kouzes amp; Posner, 1987). In addition, emergent research focuses on the behavioral and cognitive complexity of leaders (Hunt, 1991; Quinn, 1988) coupled with flexibility and social intelligence (Hooijberg, Hunt, amp; Dodge, 1997; Hooijberg amp; Schneider, in press; Zacarro, Gilbert, Thor, amp; Mumford, 1991). Whereas supervisory theories of leadership (e.g., path-goal, contin-gency, LMX) focus on task- and person-oriented behaviors of leaders as they attempt to provide guidance, support, and feedback to subordinates, strategic lead-ership focuses on the creation of meaning and purpose for the organization (House amp; Aditya, 1997).
这些新的领导力理论包括魅力型领导力理论（例如，Conger ＆ Kanungo，1987；House，1977；Shamir，House，＆ Arthur，1993），变革型领导力理论（例如，Bass，1985）；和愿景式领导力理论（如，Bennis ＆ Nanus，1985；Kouzes ＆ Posner，1987）。此外，紧急研究集中于领导者的行为和认知复杂性（Hunt，1991；Quinn，1988）以及灵活性和社会智能（Hooijberg，Hunt，＆Dodge，1997；Hooijberg ＆ Schneider，in press：Zacarro，Gilbert，Thor，＆Mumford，1991）。领导者的监督理论（例如，路径目标，意外事件，LMX）侧重于领导者的任务和面向个人的行为，当他们试图向下属提供指导、支持和反馈时，战略领导力会集中于创造意义和组织的目的（House ＆ Aditya，1997）。
In a sense, supervisory theories of leadership are about leadership “in” organiza-tions. Strategic theories of leadership are concerned with leadership “of” organiza-tions (see Hunt, 1991) and are “marked by a concern for the evolution of the organization as a whole, including its changing aims and capabilities” (Selznick, 1984, p. 5). Strategic leadership focuses on the people who have overall responsibility for the organization and includes not only the titular head of the organization but also members of what is referred to as the top management team or dominant coalition (Cyert amp; March, 1963). Researchers often focus on studying the character-istics of individuals at the strategic apex of the organization (Mintzberg, 1979), what they do, and how they do it (Hambrick, 1989). Researchers, however, have not paid much attention to the organizational and environmental context that surrounds the conditions, timing, and means of strategic leadersrsquo; actions. This is especially true of research focusing on the new and emergent leadership theories. Even the empirical research on TMTs and strategic leadership theory (Finkelstein amp; Hambrick, 1996) has only considered a narrow range of contextual and environmen-tal variables.
从某种意义上说，领导的监督理论是关于领导“组织”的。战略领导力理论与“组织”的领导有关（参见Hunt，1997），“一整个组织的发展，包括其目标和能力的变化”为标志（Selznick，1984，p.5）。战略领导力集中于对组织负全部责任的人，不仅包括组织的头目，而且包括所谓的高层管理团队或主要联盟的成员（Cyert ＆ March，1963）。研究人员经常侧重于研究组织战略高层的个人特征（Mintzberg，1979），他们做了什么以及他们怎样做（Hambrick，1989）。然而，研究人员没有给予组织和环境背景足够的重视，这些背景主要是围绕战略领导举措的条件、时机和手段的。对于关注新的和紧急的领导理论的研究尤其如此。甚至关于高层管理团队和战略领导力理论（Finkelstein ＆ Hambrick，1996）的实证研究也只考虑了范围很窄的语境和环境变量。
Activities often associated with strategic leadership include making strategic decisions; creating and communicating a vision o
全文共27249字，剩余内容已隐藏，支付完成后下载完整资料
资料编号：[145667]，资料为PDF文档或Word文档，PDF文档可免费转换为Word
以上是毕业论文外文翻译，课题毕业论文、任务书、文献综述、开题报告、程序设计、图纸设计等资料可联系客服协助查找。
